Monday, June 17, 2019
A Critical Assessment of Martin Wights Why Is There No International Essay
A Critical Assessment of Martin Wights Why Is There No International Theory - Essay ExampleWight claims that this paucity is deepen by intellectual and moral povertydue to the intellectual prejudice imposed by the sovereign State, and the belief in progress (1960/2000, p. 30). He argues that there is no body of knowledge in worldwide theory, understood as speculation about the society of states, or the family of nations, or the international community (Wight, 2000, 28), to match the successes of governmental theory, understood as speculation about the state (Wight, 2000, p. 27).The theory of the good life (Wight, 2000, p. 39), political theorys central concern, was deemed incompatible with the study of international relations (IR), since the latter is understood to be primarily engaged with survival. In this essay, we shall evaluate Wights criticism of international theory and shall attempt to constitute his damaging claim failed to take into account the changes in the internatio nal which were already evident at the time. For conceptual clarity, we henceforth use international theory and IR theory interchangeably.The sources of international theory which Wight identifies form an eclectic mix of international law (Grotius and Prufendorf), writings of irenists such as Erasmus and Sully, Machiavellian elements, the parerga of political theorists, philosophers and historians (Hume, Rousseau, and Burke), and the speeches, despatches and new(prenominal) documents of statesmen of old, like Gentz and Bismarck (Wight, 2000, pp. 28-30). To reiterate the paucity of IR theory, he maintains that most of these works remain penetrable only by the scholar, making the international slenderly of an ivory tower.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.